Module Seven: Thinking About History, learning block 7-4 (page 4) in the webtext, before exporting to Word for submission to your instructor in your learning environment. Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-1 (page 2):
? Question 1: Name three historical lenses that you could apply to gain a fuller picture of the relationship between Natives and white settlers.
? Question 2: Revise the thesis statement at the top of this page to reflect a more complex view of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Your revised thesis statement should be longer than one sentence. Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-2 (page 2):
? Question 3: Name three historical lenses that you could use to look at the events described in the video you just saw.
? Question 4: Massasoit’s decision to approach the Pilgrims about an alliance was contingent on what previous event or events? (Name one or two.)
? Question 5: Name one short-term consequence and one long-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims.
Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-3 (page 3):
? Question 6: How has your understanding of the historical event in your essay changed as a result of your research? Describe one instance of a misconception or a wrong idea you had about your topic that has been corrected after researching and writing about it.
Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-4 (page 2):
? Question 7: Name four historical lenses through which you could analyze the events of the Cherokee Removal. Specify one aspect of this event for each lens that you cite.
? Question 8: Agree or disagree with the following thesis statement: “The Treaty of New Echota was invalid, and the National Party was correct to oppose it.” Cite at least three historical facts that support your position.